Talk:Northern bottlenose whale

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mammals Start‑class Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split[edit]

What reasoning is there for a split? -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 20:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What split? --Swift (talk) 01:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pilot or bottlenose whale[edit]

I've removed the image File:Killed pilot wales, faroe islands.jpg. If this really is a bottlenose whale and not a pilot whale we should have that filename changed at commons. --Swift (talk) 01:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reduced population?[edit]

Prior to the beginning of whaling of northern bottlenoses it is estimated that there were 40,000–50,000 individuals in the North Atlantic. Between 1850 and 1973 88,000 individuals were caught, primarily by Norwegian and British whalers. The population is very likely to be much reduced compared to pre-whaling figures.

That works out to take the 88.000 at face value as just over 700 animals per annum. A stock of 40.000-50.000 can surely sustain that. In any case, a reliable citation would be appreciated, and by that I mean a scientific one, not a politically oriented one. To quote without citing: The bottlenose seems to be doing fine. 85.220.111.211 (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Huh?[edit]

"Since whaling ended the primary concern to conservationists is the number of oil and gas developments around the Gully." This sentence has no context, and makes no sense. 22:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by O0drogue0o (talk • contribs)

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion[edit]